- Posts: 273
- Thank you received: 48
andypugh wrote: Let's try to be clearer about this.
In your G-code you have:Code:G0 X-0.100 Y536.751 G0 Z4.000 G1 X-0.100 Y536.751 Z-0.100 F900.000 G1 X5.249 Y542.100 Z-0.100 F900.000
The third line is a move only in Z, as the machine is already at that XY point.
The fourth move is a G1 in X and Y at the same Z.
andypugh wrote: If the program runs to completion, finishing at X5.249 Y542.100 Z4.00 then the problem is _not_ spindle-at speed.
andypugh wrote: If the program pauses at X-0.100 Y536.751 Z4.000 and does not run to completion then spindle-at-speed seems like a very likely cause.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
andypugh wrote: Does the DRO show 4.0 for the Z, or is it that the Z doesn't move when commanded?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ikkuh wrote: If you look at the DRO in the video you can see that right after the first G1 command the DRO goes to -0.1 But the spindle itself didn't move at all in the Z direction, it is physicaly still at 5 (in this case, I changed the gcode file a little).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
andypugh wrote: Right, this sounds like hardware / config.
It seem that the Z axis might be stalling. Try reducing the MAXACCEL value for Z. Initially by a lot, ie divide by 10. Just to see if that makes a difference.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.