Floating head touch off
9 years 9 months ago #85401
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Floating head touch off
Hi guys, the zip file John attached opens as a zero byte file for me. Can someone share the Sheetcam post he posted. It seems to be the most recent resource.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months ago #85404
by BigJohnT
Replied by BigJohnT on topic Floating head touch off
Uploaded again, note that the touchoff.ngc shows 0 bytes when you hover over it with the mouse but it does have the contents.
JT
JT
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by BigJohnT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 9 months ago #85419
by rodw
Thanks John, It works for me now. Very much appreciated.
Replied by rodw on topic Floating head touch off
BigJohnT wrote: Uploaded again, note that the touchoff.ngc shows 0 bytes when you hover over it with the mouse but it does have the contents.
JT
Thanks John, It works for me now. Very much appreciated.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 4 months ago #94558
by spesmek
Replied by spesmek on topic Floating head touch off
Hello i have downloaded the post and installed it to sheetcam, but my g-code have no call for subroutine, only M03 even if i can see in the post that it should be there, my file extension is also .tap is that correct? (i know it is easy to change in linuxcnc)
here is some code:
N0010 (Filename: hengsel.tap)
N0020 (Post processor: LinuxCNC plasma.scpost)
N0030 (Date: 15.06.2017)
N0040 G21 (Units: Metric)
N0050 G40 G90
N0060 F1 S1
N0070 (Part: hengsel)
N0080 (Operation: Outside Offset, VISIBLE, T1: Plasma, 2 mm kerf)
N0090 G00 Z10.0000
N0100 X10.9991 Y6.6278
N0110 Z6.0000
N0120 M03
N0130 G04 P0.3
N0140 G01 Z2.0000 F100
N0150 G02 X10.9991 Y6.6278 I-0.0000 J4.2500 F3000.0
N0160 M05
N0170 G00 Z10.0000
N0180 X27.5577 Y52.0694
N0190 Z6.0000
N0200 M03
N0210 G04 P0.3
N0220 G01 Z2.0000 F100
N0230 X11.1225 Y40.4732 F3000
N0240 G03 X9.6860 Y39.2634 I6.3417 J-8.9879 F3000.0
N0250 G01 X5.5778 Y35.1552 F3000
N0260 G03 X2.4665 Y28.9326 I7.7782 J-7.7782 F3000.0
N0270 G01 X0.1096 Y12.4334 F3000
N0280 G03 X18.7772 Y18.6560 I10.8895 J-1.5556 F3000.0
N0290 G01 X15.9488 Y21.4844 F3000
N0300 X44.9716 Y50.5072
N0310 G02 X44.9716 Y47.5656 I1.4708 J-1.4708 F3000.0
N0320 G01 X41.6776 Y50.8597 F3000
N0330 G03 X27.5577 Y52.0694 I-7.7782 J-7.7782 F3000.0
N0340 M05
N0350 G00 Z10.0000
N0360 M05 M30
here is some code:
N0010 (Filename: hengsel.tap)
N0020 (Post processor: LinuxCNC plasma.scpost)
N0030 (Date: 15.06.2017)
N0040 G21 (Units: Metric)
N0050 G40 G90
N0060 F1 S1
N0070 (Part: hengsel)
N0080 (Operation: Outside Offset, VISIBLE, T1: Plasma, 2 mm kerf)
N0090 G00 Z10.0000
N0100 X10.9991 Y6.6278
N0110 Z6.0000
N0120 M03
N0130 G04 P0.3
N0140 G01 Z2.0000 F100
N0150 G02 X10.9991 Y6.6278 I-0.0000 J4.2500 F3000.0
N0160 M05
N0170 G00 Z10.0000
N0180 X27.5577 Y52.0694
N0190 Z6.0000
N0200 M03
N0210 G04 P0.3
N0220 G01 Z2.0000 F100
N0230 X11.1225 Y40.4732 F3000
N0240 G03 X9.6860 Y39.2634 I6.3417 J-8.9879 F3000.0
N0250 G01 X5.5778 Y35.1552 F3000
N0260 G03 X2.4665 Y28.9326 I7.7782 J-7.7782 F3000.0
N0270 G01 X0.1096 Y12.4334 F3000
N0280 G03 X18.7772 Y18.6560 I10.8895 J-1.5556 F3000.0
N0290 G01 X15.9488 Y21.4844 F3000
N0300 X44.9716 Y50.5072
N0310 G02 X44.9716 Y47.5656 I1.4708 J-1.4708 F3000.0
N0320 G01 X41.6776 Y50.8597 F3000
N0330 G03 X27.5577 Y52.0694 I-7.7782 J-7.7782 F3000.0
N0340 M05
N0350 G00 Z10.0000
N0360 M05 M30
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 4 months ago #94662
by BigJohnT
Replied by BigJohnT on topic Floating head touch off
That is not G code from my sheetcam post, you must have selected something else as a post processor.
JT
JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 4 months ago #95191
by spesmek
Replied by spesmek on topic Floating head touch off
I discovered that this was a problem related to my computer being named bjørn, sheetcam did not like the norwegian letter in the path to the post.
but i had to edit the post to put G92.1 after M5 onPenUp
If not all cutting paths was on different heights on Z axis, is this normal or is it something wrong with my setup?
Regards Bjørn K
but i had to edit the post to put G92.1 after M5 onPenUp
If not all cutting paths was on different heights on Z axis, is this normal or is it something wrong with my setup?
Regards Bjørn K
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.326 seconds