Hi Clive,
Thanks for reaching out. Ok, I can see how it might seem confrontational. It isn't my intention. However, the first step to fixing something, is admitting that problems... or at least less-than-ideal situations exist. It's not an attack, more like... "Ok, this could be improved, and I hope to help implement (or at least inspire) changes that'll save time/effort/frustration for newbies, and make it easier for the poor folks on this forum (Like PCW) that get bombarded by repeat questions. Also, some people.. are afraid to ask questions.. which if you remember your school days.. might be far more prevalent than you might at first, have considered.
I like PCW, I've only recently suspected he's Mesa-affiliated, I'm not attacking him at all. So please don't think I'm biting anyone's hand, feeding me or otherwise.
Sometimes what I type, and what I mean don't come across correctly/ quite match. So please let me be clearer.
The firmware link (under specifications > support software) on the linked page I provided in the previous post), has rendered a 404 on no less than 4 separate computers. One attempt, was less than two minutes ago.
I linked the closest working page, so the web team knows which page the link is on. Not just that the file behind that link is dead, because that's only part of the problem. With this, it should be a quick and easy fix as they have all the necessary info at their disposal. I'm trying to help Mesa/PCW here.
If your point was to demonstrate how hard it is to make perfectly clear documentation/forum posts. I acknowledge the point wholeheartedly. But just because it's hard, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done. Clearly I'm making an effort here to clarify myself, and I hope to help inspire similar actions in whatever documentation, manual, LinuxCNC guide, forum post, or whatever is being written.
So it seems I need to be clearer too, and I'll eat my slice of humble pie. We're all human, learning, tinkering, and muddling our way through life.
It's not ALL about me...
However, let's be clear here. As a beginner, sure, I could have chosen Mach3/4 or UCNC, or any other software suite/hardware combo. Ok, they have a completely GUI based configuration process, (little if any HAL like editing). Maybe some of you are thinking (perhaps loudly) that you are in fact, superior to this crazy beginner on this (which I freely acknowledge) and even I've considered whether or not I made a bad decision. I'm not giving up, but if I'm honest about my frustrations, and real-world experiences, then maybe others will feel less alone or at least get a laugh out of me scratching my ever receding hairline.
I have such lovely hair, it'd just a shame I let my skin and ears grow over it. Hehe. But back to my point...
It's the people who just fade away, and stop talking here who may have quietly given up on CNC altogether (such a shame) or choose an alternative, and I think this robs the LinuxCNC community of opportunities. You can have the nicest forum in the world, (Honestly no complaints) but it's never going to be the most efficient way to do the basics if people stop visiting because they're tired of the same old stuff, day in, day out. Imagine if PCW and the other key forum "players" weren't available... would even veterans be able to get all the guidance they need? I'm not belittling anyone, here.
It's undeniable, that LinuxCNC isn't the simplest softwre to implement for newbies. I don't know what is... but I want to help pave the way, even if it's a little smoother for the beginners who are yet to come. Honestly, I can relate to that quite well right now. So I'm talking about what I know. If that seems confrontational, then I am truly sorry for making you feel that way.
Anyway, I am only ever hoping to help. Maybe my help and/or perspective is unwanted, and that's OK.. I'm not needy/narcissistic enough to think I'll be liked by everyone.
Forums where people are sharing their wisdom are amazing, but oh how I wish there were easier ways to communicate at times.
All the best,
Hamish.