comparing to Grbl, or FluidNC

More
28 Apr 2025 00:09 #327200 by unknown
Replied by unknown on topic comparing to Grbl, or FluidNC
but in theory, a Grbl component could completely replace the EMCMot+Stepgen components in LinuxCNC for stepper motors signal generation.


Hmmmm ok

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Apr 2025 19:04 #327231 by meister
Replied by meister on topic comparing to Grbl, or FluidNC
the answer is simple,
GRBL,... is a firmware for CNC milling machines, laser cutters and the like.

LinuxCNC is a highly configurable motion control platform,
it can synchronize all kinds of input and output devices,
also from external not self-controlled movements.

It can handle all kinds of actuators, not only step/dir or RC servos. It can handle all kinds of protocols like Ethercat, CAN, Modbus, .... and even mixed.

It can handle
all kinds of inputs, glass scales, encoders, camera images, .....

It also doesn't need gCode as input, that's just another module in the chain


So if you want to operate a simple hobby CNC, you are well served with GRBL and so on, for everything else LinuxCNC is the best choice.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 May 2025 10:40 #327410 by timo
Replied by timo on topic comparing to Grbl, or FluidNC
One aspect that I did not see mentioned is the time delay between inputs and action on some of the systems.
My Marlin based 3d printer takes ages to accept a feed override or pause instruction. (seems to finish the complete "look ahead", before it stops?)
Something that I would not be happy with. For a milling machine things quickly become expensive and messy when the machine is able to destroy itself.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, meister

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
01 May 2025 11:28 #327417 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic comparing to Grbl, or FluidNC

One aspect that I did not see mentioned is the time delay between inputs and action on some of the systems.

I did mention LinuxCNC is real time systems, so there is no delay, maybe 1-3ms normally.
But your explanation is much easier to understand. :)
The following user(s) said Thank You: meister

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: piasdom
Time to create page: 0.074 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum