On Backlash compensation and outcomes

I am presently helping a friend convert a manual chinese bench top milling machine.
Conversion is based on keling steppers and drivers.
So far motors fitted and machine runing.
Milling holes results in some distoriton ( almost rectangles with rounded corners ) when of certain diameter.
Checked and measured backlash.
X axis approx 0.53mm Y axis 0.23m .
Modified the .INI files such that the acceleration settinge as per recomendation ( tried both a factor of 1.5X and 2X )and applied the respective backlash numbers to axes.
Net outcome when milling holes is eliptical paths as opposed to rounded rectangles previously.
One of the holes is quite round the other couple holes have this pronounced elipticity.
Gcode contain R rather than IJ circle definition if thats of any importance.


QUESTIONS:
What is the range of backlash values the simple BACKLASH = compensation scheme will handle with some success?
Why do I end up with an elipse post compensation rather than a circle?

Hello,

Have you tried just milling a straight line and measuring the outcome on both x and y?
Besides the backlash is there excess flex?
Different speeds result in different results?
Conventional and climb cut give same results?
Have you tried using I J instead?
Not sure how far backlash comp can go and still be practical, but I have tried it pretty high.

Rick G

You might try checking to see if in fact you are losing steps, and if so where.
If you find you are losing steps only with the backlash compensation on then you can try reducing the MAX_VELOCITY and adjusting the MAX_ACCELERATION of the Axis that is losing steps.
I find that if the backlash is consistent for the travel of the axis backlash compensation should work well, however if there is a fair amount of variation of the backlash across the travel of the axis mapping may work better.

Rick G