G64 not read properly in RS247NGC_STARTUP_CODE
somehow, the G64 is not activated properly in the startup code.
My startup code reads like
I also triedRS247NGC_STARTUP_CODE = G17 G21 G40 G49 G64P0.1Q0.2 G80 G90 G92X0Y0Z0 G94 G97
with the same resultRS247NGC_STARTUP_CODE = G17 G21 G40 G49 G64 P0.1 Q0.2 G80 G90 G92X0Y0Z0 G94 G97
By the way, I find the default behavior with having a value that large that the machine runs with full speed around corners not ideal. I would rather expect that the machine would run in exact stop mode if &4 is not explicitely activated.
Anyone have a clue how to set it properly in the startup code in the ini?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
What did the machine do with a nc programm G64 P0.01 Q0.02 included?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I can clearly see the radii in the trajectory history in linuxcnc. First I thought it might be a problem with the servo drives.
When G64 is used in a NC program it works nicely and exactly like described in the documentation.
However, it seems not to be enabled by the startup g code. It also resets after a restart of linuxcnc. So the settings do not get saved permanently.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The current version is 2.9.1. It is on the downloads page. Perhaps the issue is resolved.I am using the current 2.8.4 stable release
It is much safer to set the preamble in the gcode file
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
But as Rod mentioned anything can override the setting.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Thanks for the remarks. I will test it once I have upgraded.
However, did anyone test including G64 in the startup code and verified it is actually processed correctly?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
so having it in startup_code I find it imho useless
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.