Connecting Multiple Smart Serial Devices to a 7i76e

More
09 Jan 2024 21:41 #290304 by my1987toyota
  So I have been contemplating using a 7i73 and a 7i71 connected to a 7i76e's smart serial line. However I have never done
it , and so far my searches have come up with little. As I understand it they work on the RS-422 protocol . If I understand that
correctly you have to run it kind of daisy chained. Meaning the cable probably runs to the 7i73 then from the 7i73 to the 7i71
then you have to set the device in the middle (7i73) to un-terminated (W10 W11 down) and the 7i71 to terminated
(W10, W11 up). Correct?
 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jan 2024 21:51 #290307 by tommylight
I do not think so, pretty sure each needs it's own channel.
So far i have always used a 7i74 to connect multiple SSerial devices, it can do 8 channels and it needs a DB25 to IDC26 cable, both easily found.
Might also need changing the firmware on 7i76E.
As usual, might want to wait for PCW as he knows best.
The following user(s) said Thank You: my1987toyota

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jan 2024 21:56 #290308 by cornholio
Nope each smart serial device requires it’s own smart serial channel.
So for 2 smart serial devices you need 2 channels.

The 7i74 plugs into a Mesa db25 connector but you’ll need firmware to suit store.mesanet.com/index.php?route=produc...83_87&product_id=117
The following user(s) said Thank You: my1987toyota

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jan 2024 22:00 #290310 by PCW
Each SSerial device needs its own channel (they are RS-422 full duplex devices, not RS-485
half duplex) So you would need a 7I74, 7I85 (or just a SP491 chip wired to and expansion port)
to have more than the one built-in SSerial port on the 7I76E.

The reason we chose RS-422 is that:

1. All communications are done in parallel (so speed is the same regardless of the number of devices)
2. No marginal RS-485 termination issues (Async RS-485 devices need kludgy bias resistors to define the state
of the un-driven bus so suffer from lowered noise immunity compared to always driven full duplex RS-422)
The following user(s) said Thank You: my1987toyota

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jan 2024 22:16 #290315 by tommylight

The reason we chose RS-422 is that:

1. All communications are done in parallel (so speed is the same regardless of the number of devices)
2. No marginal RS-485 termination issues (Async RS-485 devices need kludgy bias resistors to define the state
of the un-driven bus so suffer from lowered noise immunity compared to always driven full duplex RS-422)

I am very greatfull for that, i still have traumas from using RS232 and RS485, a lot! :)
The following user(s) said Thank You: my1987toyota

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jan 2024 22:41 - 09 Jan 2024 23:45 #290316 by my1987toyota
Glad I asked.
So it's a point to point system like RS-232 but better. Got it.
Last edit: 09 Jan 2024 23:45 by my1987toyota.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jan 2024 11:06 #290347 by JT
I might add you can flash the 7i76E with the correct firmware with my Mesa Configuration Tool.

JT
The following user(s) said Thank You: my1987toyota

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jan 2024 21:28 #290457 by my1987toyota

I might add you can flash the 7i76E with the correct firmware with my Mesa Configuration Tool.

JT
 

Thanks JT

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: PCWjmelson
Time to create page: 0.100 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum