Position: relative expected
- poesel
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 2
01 Jun 2025 17:46 #329523
by poesel
Position: relative expected was created by poesel
Hi,
I'm trying to run a little test program, and it aborts with the fault message: 'Motor 0 Positionssfehler (sic!) Position: relativ erwartet' ('motor 0 positioning error position: relative expected').
The program is this:
Thanks!
P.S. little typo: 'Positionssfehler' should be 'Positionsfehler'
I'm trying to run a little test program, and it aborts with the fault message: 'Motor 0 Positionssfehler (sic!) Position: relativ erwartet' ('motor 0 positioning error position: relative expected').
The program is this:
I'm a bit surprised since I'm setting G90. What am I doing wrong?%
(G90: Set to Absolute Positioning)
G90
(G94: Feed Rate Mode Units per Minute)
G94
(G17: Select XY plane for arc moves for G2 G3)
G17
(G21: Set Units to Millimeters)
G21
(G54: Select coordinate system 1)
G54
G1 X0 Y0 F1000
G1 X10 Y0
G1 X10 Y10
G1 X0 Y10
G1 X0 Y0
M30
%
Thanks!
P.S. little typo: 'Positionssfehler' should be 'Positionsfehler'
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4661
- Thank you received: 2078
02 Jun 2025 07:35 - 02 Jun 2025 07:47 #329534
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Position: relative expected
Seems that there may actually be two printouts on the same line:which comes from motionwhich seems to come from the Axis GUI:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/6f7753...s/tcl/axis.tcl#L1838
You are not giving us much else to go on. Are you getting getting following errors on joint 0 when using other Gcode or is it only with this particular program?
'joint 0 following error''position: relative commanded'github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/6f7753...s/tcl/axis.tcl#L1838
You are not giving us much else to go on. Are you getting getting following errors on joint 0 when using other Gcode or is it only with this particular program?
Last edit: 02 Jun 2025 07:47 by Aciera.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- poesel
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 2
02 Jun 2025 19:44 #329562
by poesel
Replied by poesel on topic Position: relative expected
I haven't tried any other program. This was my first test and I made it as basic as possible.
Could there be something in the .hal or .ini that makes it expect relative positions?
What information do you need?
Could there be something in the .hal or .ini that makes it expect relative positions?
What information do you need?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4661
- Thank you received: 2078
03 Jun 2025 08:03 #329590
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Position: relative expected
Does axis jogging work?
If you issue an MDI command (eg 'G1 x10 f1000') do you get a ''Motor 0 Positionssfehler'? If so try to lower the feed rate (eg 'G1 x10 f10').
Impossible to troubleshoot further without knowing more about your configuration so post your hal and ini files.
If you issue an MDI command (eg 'G1 x10 f1000') do you get a ''Motor 0 Positionssfehler'? If so try to lower the feed rate (eg 'G1 x10 f10').
Impossible to troubleshoot further without knowing more about your configuration so post your hal and ini files.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- poesel
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 2
05 Jun 2025 20:00 #329769
by poesel
Replied by poesel on topic Position: relative expected
Sorry for the late reply.
Well, I should have respected the wisdom of the ancients: 'have you tried turning it off and on again?'.
I tried the MDI command and it worked. Then I reloaded the program and it worked, too. Nothing changed, just a reboot between the tries.
Thanks for your support!
Well, I should have respected the wisdom of the ancients: 'have you tried turning it off and on again?'.
I tried the MDI command and it worked. Then I reloaded the program and it worked, too. Nothing changed, just a reboot between the tries.
Thanks for your support!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- unknown
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 888
- Thank you received: 325
06 Jun 2025 23:24 #329847
by unknown
Replied by unknown on topic Position: relative expected
I'm pretty sure Tommy would disagree with that, personally I've never had any issues with HP gear, even the ancient server I was running 24/7.
I'd say that there are quite a few HP machines running Linuxcnc that never give any issues.
I'd say that there are quite a few HP machines running Linuxcnc that never give any issues.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 21364
- Thank you received: 7287
07 Jun 2025 01:10 #329853
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Position: relative expected
Oh yes, i did disagree with that statement, silently, as he might have experience with "Home" or "Office" types of HP computers and those are frankly cr@p, but "Enterprise" HP computers and workstations are magnificent in every way and some have 700W or 1000W power supplies despite no way of cramming stuff in it to require that kind of power. Same goes for Dell and Lenovo and Fujitsu and older Fujitsu-Siemens, all of those in the "Enterprise" edition work perfectly, no matter how old, and using them 24/7 is a given.
And yes, there are many of us here using HP even on industrial machines, as again, they never fail.
And yes, there are many of us here using HP even on industrial machines, as again, they never fail.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MaHa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 509
- Thank you received: 213
07 Jun 2025 02:16 #329857
by MaHa
Replied by MaHa on topic Position: relative expected
HP 800 G2 SFF and HP 800 G3 SFF with Intel network are perfect with Mesa cards. No issues, except replacing a noisy CPU fan
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 21364
- Thank you received: 7287
07 Jun 2025 02:39 - 07 Jun 2025 02:41 #329858
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Position: relative expected
MaHa, why you up so early? 
4:40AM here, going to bed right now.
And whatever the reason you are up so early, i hope it's a good one.
4:40AM here, going to bed right now.
And whatever the reason you are up so early, i hope it's a good one.
Last edit: 07 Jun 2025 02:41 by tommylight. Reason: more info
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MaHa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 509
- Thank you received: 213
07 Jun 2025 10:53 #329872
by MaHa
I was completing and testing my new parameter subroutine for helical inside or outside contour ramp, adjustable stepover and x/y/z allowance finishing cut. Took the whole night to iron out some misbehaviour
Replied by MaHa on topic Position: relative expected
MaHa, why you up so early?I was completing and testing my new parameter subroutine for helical inside or outside contour ramp, adjustable stepover and x/y/z allowance finishing cut. Took the whole night to iron out some misbehaviour
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.120 seconds