linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?

More
23 Nov 2025 10:59 - 23 Nov 2025 11:01 #339039 by michaeln
Replied by michaeln on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?
 
Last edit: 23 Nov 2025 11:01 by michaeln.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 11:02 - 23 Nov 2025 11:04 #339041 by michaeln
Replied by michaeln on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?
Hello,
your problem is not the amdgpu.
That is the "normal" raspi-firmware-bug. Please use: sudo dpkg -P raspi-firmware
I think the amdgpu error message you can ignore. I have the same on my old amd-test-pc

Hi all, i tested again today with a fresh download of  2.9.4 from the main page. And now i am stuck as all the other ones are at, the missing "amdpgu fault". 
Was there a solution on that fault ?, i cant decipher if there was one, on all the other forum posts with that fault. 
ibb.co/G4FrwL3t

If there is not a solution i will try the "mint" Tommylight uploaded :)

 

Attachments:
Last edit: 23 Nov 2025 11:04 by michaeln.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Beovoxo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
23 Nov 2025 16:40 #339061 by tommylight
The following user(s) said Thank You: Beovoxo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 19:59 #339086 by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?

I still stand by my removed comment.
And I'm very sorry to say but you admins are weak and spineless to allow this buffoon to carry on the way he does.
It's a shame the CoC doesn't cover giving advice to members that is completely useless, a waste of time and potentially to the point of causing harm.
But no, the main point is not to hurt anyone feelings or to cause offense.
Who is going to have the intensal fortitude and read Langdon's the riot act. I tried in the beginning to guide him in the right direction but he would appear not to care.
You admins need to take action, I'm sick to effing death in having to make his posts an issue in the hope something will be done to rectify his behaviour. Until then I will keep raising this issue, or you can just ban me. I don't care much, Ive lost faith in every single one on the Admins on this site. You aren't doing a single thing to protect other forum members, especially new ones from his nonsense. At this juncture you all disgust me.


I can only speak for myself, but I just recognize him for the bored high school student that he is. I feel bad for new people but imagine they quickly realize his replies are virtually useless and very likely the regurgitation of misguided ChatGPT responses.

I stand by my previous advice to not feed the under-bridge dwelling creatures, and ignore him until he moves on, gets himself banned, or discovers better things to do with his time. But it’s a bit pointless for us to block him as he, like you, will probably just make a new username and start over. Trust me, it’s been discussed.

You have something he does not, which is the ability to contribute meaningfully to this community (I remember the Beaglebrainz ISO’s very well). So I ask you to just ignore him, let his mindless comments stand for themselves, and don’t let it affect your integrity.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, Clive S, Beovoxo, unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 22:30 #339093 by Beovoxo
Replied by Beovoxo on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?
i got it working :) i installed again after xx reinstall and did the install without internet cable connected, and choose english as my native ""UTC -8 GB""", and then i didn't sudo update after install.
I then rebooted and connected network and run sudo update and installed it .. "ethercat setup and all things works" :):):):):)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 22:36 #339095 by Beovoxo
Replied by Beovoxo on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?
THX all i was going insane on all the problems i had :) also because i have been running anything before with no problems. .. I did learn dont update anything that works lol :)... i am quiet sure that some of the problems i had was either bad image or software fault :)
The following user(s) said Thank You: langdons

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 22:45 #339097 by Beovoxo
Replied by Beovoxo on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?
File Attachment:

Ethercat running again with the first set of IO :) daam nice :):) thx all
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 23:52 #339099 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?

I still stand by my removed comment.
And I'm very sorry to say but you admins are weak and spineless to allow this buffoon to carry on the way he does.
It's a shame the CoC doesn't cover giving advice to members that is completely useless, a waste of time and potentially to the point of causing harm.
But no, the main point is not to hurt anyone feelings or to cause offense.
Who is going to have the intensal fortitude and read Langdon's the riot act. I tried in the beginning to guide him in the right direction but he would appear not to care.
You admins need to take action, I'm sick to effing death in having to make his posts an issue in the hope something will be done to rectify his behaviour. Until then I will keep raising this issue, or you can just ban me. I don't care much, Ive lost faith in every single one on the Admins on this site. You aren't doing a single thing to protect other forum members, especially new ones from his nonsense. At this juncture you all disgust me.

I can only speak for myself, but I just recognize him for the bored high school student that he is. I feel bad for new people but imagine they quickly realize his replies are virtually useless and very likely the regurgitation of misguided ChatGPT responses.

I stand by my previous advice to not feed the under-bridge dwelling creatures, and ignore him until he moves on, gets himself banned, or discovers better things to do with his time. But it’s a bit pointless for us to block him as he, like you, will probably just make a new username and start over. Trust me, it’s been discussed.

You have something he does not, which is the ability to contribute meaningfully to this community (I remember the Beaglebrainz ISO’s very well). So I ask you to just ignore him, let his mindless comments stand for themselves, and don’t let it affect your integrity.

I don't use ChatGPT.

Ever.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Nov 2025 23:57 - 24 Nov 2025 00:07 #339100 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso checksum?

Well a slightly newer version could work too.

Try whatever came right before "Bookworm", see if it's old enough.
 
Thats the thing. The LinuxCNC version before Bookworm was on a Wheezy ISO. There was no linuxcnc version released on Bullseye (5.10 kernel) which precedes Bookworm. We don't want to hear Ubuntu being suggested. That's bad advice (as is using Wheezy which is akin to suggesting people drive a Model T Ford)


linuxcnc.org/iso/linuxcnc-2.8.0-buster.iso
2.8.x say "Buster", not "Wheezy".

I'm not a huge Ubuntu fan anymore, but with Ubuntu Pro they give security updates basically forever, which could be handy for an old, unsupported GPU.

Also, I had no idea Wheezy was so ancient; it's almost as old as me!
Last edit: 24 Nov 2025 00:07 by langdons.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
24 Nov 2025 00:03 #339101 by langdons
Replied by langdons on topic linuxcnc_2.9.4-amd64.hybrid.iso cheksum?

THX all i was going insane on all the problems i had :) also because i have been running anything before with no problems. .. I did learn dont update anything that works lol :)... i am quiet sure that some of the problems i had was either bad image or software fault :)

Beware of bad images, they often seem to work, but then weird stuff starts to happen...

FreeBSD's installer checks the hashes of everything before installing, but GNU/Linux installers don't seem to do that, even though they probably should.

I wonder why they don't; after all, it would save everyone's time in the long run.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Beovoxo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.096 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum