Not a bug report

More
7 years 10 months ago #123271 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Not a bug report
The configs you supplied are not working parallel port configurations they are both sim configs.

Note that 1_wrap.ngc works with LinuxCNC 2.8 for me both on real hardware and on
sim configurations. This is why providing actual data (like an error plot) can help find the issue, as it may be nearly impossible to duplicate your exact setup that triggers the error without some hint of what the actual error is...
The following user(s) said Thank You: grump

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 10 months ago - 7 years 10 months ago #123272 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Not a bug report
I have worked with this a bit more and at least in my case i can fix all acceleration violations
I have found by setting the G64 PXXX value to a reasonable number.

Both of your example GCode files are in mm and have G64 P 0.001 (1 micron blending!)
If I change this to 0.01 mm blending I no longer have acceleration violations in 1.ngc
with my (very aggressive) velocity and acceleration settings
Last edit: 7 years 10 months ago by PCW.
The following user(s) said Thank You: grump

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 10 months ago #123300 by grump
Replied by grump on topic Not a bug report
But my point is: I don't need to fix anything in the current release nor in the earlier versions of 2.8.
And yes they are sim configs as I had to put the parport machine back to version 2.7.14 after the upgrade didn't work.
The 0.001 comes from the drawing line thickness as I am engraving jewelry and need to work within extremely fine tolerances.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 10 months ago #123301 by grump
Replied by grump on topic Not a bug report
Thank you for your input. I will stick with the stable version until the final release of 2.8.
The beauty of Linuxcnc is it can be installed completely in a few minutes unlike the alternatives, so it's easy to backpedal a version or two if needed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 10 months ago - 7 years 10 months ago #123302 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Not a bug report
2.7 has the exact same bug as 2.8 with too small PXXX values
I would suggest trying reasonable values for PXXX to see if it fixes the issue
(.001 mm is not a reasonable number here considering that your actual step resolution is only .0025 mm)
Last edit: 7 years 10 months ago by PCW.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 5 months ago #133231 by grump
Replied by grump on topic Not a bug report
Whatever it was it has been sorted now and all is working well again, till the next time it breaks.
Just as well because I don't fancy changing thousands of ngc files to suit a glitch in the system.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.407 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum