HAL Question
03 Jul 2020 22:01 #173557
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic HAL Question
I tried heaps of options to get it to turn on until I did that with motion-type.
The space should not make any difference except to pedantic code reviewers.
So if you want to test if the torch is shorted which is what I think you really want to do, you could use the or2 component so that power-on or the plasmac test button turn the relay.
You should know enough about hal by now to do that yourself
The space should not make any difference except to pedantic code reviewers.
So if you want to test if the torch is shorted which is what I think you really want to do, you could use the or2 component so that power-on or the plasmac test button turn the relay.
You should know enough about hal by now to do that yourself
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Jul 2020 22:19 #173561
by snowgoer540
My attention to detail knows no bounds
... except when I miss the obvious haha
You give me more credit than I deserve, but I’ll dork around with it and try to figure it out, there has to be an example out there I can plagiarize shamelessly!
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic HAL Question
I tried heaps of options to get it to turn on until I did that with motion-type.
The space should not make any difference except to pedantic code reviewers.
So if you want to test if the torch is shorted which is what I think you really want to do, you could use the or2 component so that power-on or the plasmac test button turn the relay.
You should know enough about hal by now to do that yourself
My attention to detail knows no bounds
... except when I miss the obvious hahaYou give me more credit than I deserve, but I’ll dork around with it and try to figure it out, there has to be an example out there I can plagiarize shamelessly!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Jul 2020 23:50 #173567
by snowgoer540
Yea, but I guess what I'm asking, is the other ones had 3 things. For example:or is Rod just breaking it up ? Meaning, would the following do the same thing:
Just trying to wrap my head around this... starting to make sense, but just enough to get the thing to error out and complain to me until I get it right.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic HAL Question
Unfortunately there is no convention, folk do it the way that suits them.
The => and <= are not required, they are only used to make it (supposedly) easily human readable.
Yea, but I guess what I'm asking, is the other ones had 3 things. For example:
net plasmac:ohmic-enable plasmac.ohmic-enable => ohmicsense.is-probingnet plasmac:ohmic-enable <= plasmac.ohmic-enable
net plasmac:ohmic-enable => ohmicsense.is-probingJust trying to wrap my head around this... starting to make sense, but just enough to get the thing to error out and complain to me until I get it right.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.143 seconds