Center Spot Sheetcam Post

More
7 years 1 month ago #145094 by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post
No, everything else stays the same.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #145095 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post

docwelch wrote: With my 45xp set in marking/gouging mode and turned down to 10 amp as the book says, 50mS torch on time set in PlasmaC, I still have the same issue - the first torch fire works, the second does not, the third one does. I don't have the mechanized marking shield they call for but the other consumables are as called out in the manual.

Next test is Phill's experimental version posted earlier.

Steven


My thinking is that the 50 ms was not 50 ms becasue of the latency in turning the torch on. So 50 ms might only have been 10 ms or so or even 0 ms. I noticed that the 20 second delay you mentioned you needed coincided with the post flow of your machine.
I'll do my own thing for a while and report back.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #145097 by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post
I was thinking that the 50mS rather than referring to torch on time means 50mS AFTER Arc OK. This would equate to 350 in the experimental comp. But... if you need to change consumables to achieve this then there is really no benefit gained from having this 'spotting' addition to the config, it could easily be obtained from GCode.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • thefabricator03
  • Topic Author
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
7 years 1 month ago #145099 by thefabricator03
Replied by thefabricator03 on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post

phillc54 wrote: I was thinking that the 50mS rather than referring to torch on time means 50mS AFTER Arc OK. This would equate to 350 in the experimental comp. But... if you need to change consumables to achieve this then there is really no benefit gained from having this 'spotting' addition to the config, it could easily be obtained from GCode.


It would seem that figure would be with the arc OK, most cnc plasma machines would need the arc OK to work.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #145100 by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post
I think so too and then that brings us back to the issue that you guys with high amperage machines are going to burn a crater rather than a dimple due to the current and amount of time to get an Arc OK.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #145101 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Center Spot Sheetcam Post

phillc54 wrote: I was thinking that the 50mS rather than referring to torch on time means 50mS AFTER Arc OK. This would equate to 350 in the experimental comp. But... if you need to change consumables to achieve this then there is really no benefit gained from having this 'spotting' addition to the config, it could easily be obtained from GCode.


I don't think so as even just waiting until arcOK blows a hole maybe 12mm deep in 16mm steel. Thats a bit more than a dimple! I'll keep experimenting but what works for me may not work for HT machines.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.131 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum