New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
- phillc54
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 5711
 - Thank you received: 2093
 
			
	
						29 Mar 2020 11:22				#161954
		by phillc54
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by phillc54 on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch			
			
				I think the runtest fails should be fixed before getting too far ahead, they obviously indicate a problem/problems somewhere.			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						29 Mar 2020 11:43				#161958
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
				
Seems Issues $134, #177 and #283 refer. I think Andy is on the job as #283 was committed 19 hours ago to the official state-tags branch. The notes in the first test says it will be fixed by release of State tags and referred to #134. Talk about going around in circles for years!
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch			
			I think the runtest fails should be fixed before getting too far ahead, they obviously indicate a problem/problems somewhere.
Seems Issues $134, #177 and #283 refer. I think Andy is on the job as #283 was committed 19 hours ago to the official state-tags branch. The notes in the first test says it will be fixed by release of State tags and referred to #134. Talk about going around in circles for years!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
 - Offline
 - Moderator
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 7230
 - Thank you received: 2106
 
			
	
						29 Mar 2020 23:47				#162043
		by cmorley
	
	
		
			
	
	
			 		
													
	
				Replied by cmorley on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch			
			
				Well I tried a rverse-feedcode-2.8 mix branch and it seems to have worked ok.
I's like to discuss if that's a tolerable idea - but I think Andy is the only other developer to talk to about this ...
usually I would discuss this on the mail list (where it should be).
Chris
					I's like to discuss if that's a tolerable idea - but I think Andy is the only other developer to talk to about this ...
usually I would discuss this on the mail list (where it should be).
Chris
		The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw 	
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Moderator
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 19678
 - Thank you received: 4559
 
			
	
						30 Mar 2020 22:13				#162163
		by andypugh
	
	
		
			
	
	
			 		
													
	
				Replied by andypugh on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch			
			
				Lets take it to the dev list. Perhaps Zultron will chip in?			
					
		The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw 	
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						30 Mar 2020 23:11				#162182
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
				
Thanks Andy. There seems to be no reason why reverse run can't be pushed back to 2.8 as its been in master branch for over 12 months so its probably the most extensively tested new feature ever suggested for release.
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch			
			Lets take it to the dev list. Perhaps Zultron will chip in?
Thanks Andy. There seems to be no reason why reverse run can't be pushed back to 2.8 as its been in master branch for over 12 months so its probably the most extensively tested new feature ever suggested for release.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
		Moderators: snowgoer540	
		Time to create page: 0.073 seconds