I would suggest having the access level set in designer. This makes it easier from a editing standpoint, and also harder for somebody to change permission levels.
Cheers - will run with that. It was also my preferred path and will be way quicker to implement.
Stage 1 on security feature done and pull request raised to framework. This supports trapping the security level against a widget via Designer.
As for the behaviour side of the implemnetation I am thinking doing this via a plugin is the correct pattern. This way it's not there as standing overhead and can be enabled by a UI designer via the UI's yaml config file.
Hi, has anyone tried MonoKrom on a mill yet. I think it would be fun to keep the oldschool look of my current retrofit project. For my other machines I’ve used probe basic, but I am not sure if it fits the screen I’ve here.
Thanks Patrick
Hazzy did the initial mill work. But don’t know if he has done anything more than sim tests with it. I’m solely focused on the plasma version slowly nibbling at the long road to catchup with qtplasmac.
