- Posts: 423
- Thank you received: 93
biesse rover 316 retrofit
- Masiwood123
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
4 years 8 months ago #235262
by Masiwood123
Replied by Masiwood123 on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
unfortunately changing arc_blend_enable = 0 or 1 has no effect, feedrate is drastically reduced at the entrance and exit of the curve. I increased the engine acceleration to 600 the same.
I insert arc_blend_enable = 0 just in ini file..ahve to check what is in hal?
www.youtube.com/shorts/nN50b9CzEUQ
www.youtube.com/shorts/GV75rVuPlfc
I insert arc_blend_enable = 0 just in ini file..ahve to check what is in hal?
www.youtube.com/shorts/nN50b9CzEUQ
www.youtube.com/shorts/GV75rVuPlfc
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
4 years 8 months ago #235272
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
Looks like something in gcode is causing that, so can you use Inkscape to generate a simple shape using built in extensions>gcodetools>path to gcode.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Masiwood123
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 423
- Thank you received: 93
4 years 8 months ago #235277
by Masiwood123
Replied by Masiwood123 on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
i am using just solidcam for this i am working on wood chairs.. i can try simple circles gcode from aspire to export as ngc not nc as is in solidcam. i take a look in hal pins it’s now false in arc blend enable but the same situation with exact stop at arcs. Will check with gcode exported as ngc with same contour as in solidcam. but just to check.. in practice i must use solidcam for toolpaths.thank you
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
4 years 8 months ago #235280
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
Ok, try adding
G64 P0.5
at the top of the gcode file, if 0.5mm of tolerance is OK, try also lower values like 0.3 or 0.1, see if that helps.
G64 P0.5
at the top of the gcode file, if 0.5mm of tolerance is OK, try also lower values like 0.3 or 0.1, see if that helps.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Masiwood123
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Masiwood123
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 423
- Thank you received: 93
4 years 8 months ago #235282
by Masiwood123
Replied by Masiwood123 on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
yes, I added that too, although I think P0.1, I'm not at the machine now, but I'll see tomorrow, maybe a higher value will help
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4737
- Thank you received: 1480
4 years 8 months ago #235283
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic biesse rover 316 retrofit
I agree, it looks like it might possibly be something in the g-code. Could you post a bit of the problem g-code that exhibits the problem for closer inspection.
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Solidworks, so I may not be much help adjusting its settings to better optimize it's output, but we may be able to make general suggestions.
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Solidworks, so I may not be much help adjusting its settings to better optimize it's output, but we may be able to make general suggestions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.360 seconds