Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
- phillc54
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5723
- Thank you received: 2095
06 Sep 2020 13:11 #180995
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
There is no torch off signal in that code, this seems to indicate it is not a M5 error then.
Can you add a M5 $0 after the G1 X0 Y0 and see it there is a difference?
Does it give the following error after a run with the torch disabled?
I won't see the reply till tomorrow, off to bed...
Can you add a M5 $0 after the G1 X0 Y0 and see it there is a difference?
Does it give the following error after a run with the torch disabled?
I won't see the reply till tomorrow, off to bed...
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mud
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mud
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 142
- Thank you received: 25
06 Sep 2020 13:12 #180996
by Mud
Replied by Mud on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
This also trips right at the end.
g21
g64 p0.005
m52 p1
f#<_hal[plasmac.cut-feed-rate]>
t0 m6
g43 h0
g0 x0 y0
m3 $0 s1
g1 x0 y50
g1 x50 y50
g1 x50 y0
g1 x0 y0
m5 $0
t1 m6
g43 h0
g0 x0 y0
m3 $1 s1
g1 x0 y50
g1 x50 y50
g1 x50 y0
g1 x0 y0
m5 $1
t0 m6
g43 h0
g0 x0 y0
m2Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mud
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 142
- Thank you received: 25
06 Sep 2020 13:14 - 06 Sep 2020 13:15 #180997
by Mud
Like this? It still trips at the end.
Edit to add, I'm only running with the torch disabled right now.
Replied by Mud on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
There is no torch off signal in that code, this seems to indicate it is not a M5 error then.
Can you add a M5 $0 after the G1 X0 Y0 and see it there is a difference?
Does it give the following error after a run with the torch disabled?
I won't see the reply till tomorrow, off to bed...
Like this? It still trips at the end.
g21 g64p0.1 g40 g49 g80 g90 g92.1 g94 g97
f#<_hal[plasmac.cut-feed-rate]>
g0 x0 y0
m3 $0 s1
g1 x0 y50
g1 x50 y50
g1 x50 y0
g1 x0 y0
m5 $0
g21 g64p0.1 g40 g49 g80 g90 g92.1 g94 g97
m2Edit to add, I'm only running with the torch disabled right now.
Last edit: 06 Sep 2020 13:15 by Mud.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2431
- Thank you received: 800
06 Sep 2020 13:32 #181000
by snowgoer540
Interesting, I only see the problem when the torch is enabled. I will try to run your code and see what it does for me here.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
Edit to add, I'm only running with the torch disabled right now.
Interesting, I only see the problem when the torch is enabled. I will try to run your code and see what it does for me here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mud
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 18530
- Thank you received: 5079
06 Sep 2020 14:01 #181006
by PCW
I would say that you have solved the real time issues so there's no point it using a different NIC
Is Joint 3 the Z axis?
Can you post your ini file?
Replied by PCW on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
Ok...I'm now in Mint 19.2 with kernel 4.19.106-rt44-lcnc and 2.8.0. Same problem of joint 3 following error (triggers on the arc out of the circle shown), irrespective of IPO cycle time of 1ms or 2ms (and I tried halving P). The halcmd tmax values are now lower though.
Since it's now a fresh install I'll double-check everything again, but it seems I'm back where I was (albeit less legacy to worry about).
I'm assuming I'm going to be very embarrassed by whatever the problem ends up being...
Is it worth me trying to use the 7i96 with the Realtek RTL8196/8110 PCI NIC?
I would say that you have solved the real time issues so there's no point it using a different NIC
Is Joint 3 the Z axis?
Can you post your ini file?
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mud
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mud
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 142
- Thank you received: 25
06 Sep 2020 14:09 #181007
by Mud
Replied by Mud on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
Yes, joint 3 is z - I've attached my INI.
Should I be getting the line 'Segmentation fault' on running this mesaflash command?
Should I be getting the line 'Segmentation fault' on running this mesaflash command?
mud@Plasma:~$ mesaflash --device 7i96 --addr 10.10.10.10 --readhmid
Configuration Name: HOSTMOT2
General configuration information:
BoardName : MESA7I96
FPGA Size: 9 KGates
FPGA Pins: 144
Number of IO Ports: 3
Width of one I/O port: 17
Clock Low frequency: 100.0000 MHz
Clock High frequency: 200.0000 MHz
IDROM Type: 3
Instance Stride 0: 4
Instance Stride 1: 64
Register Stride 0: 256
Register Stride 1: 256
Modules in configuration:
Module: DPLL
There are 1 of DPLL in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 7
BaseAddress: 7000
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: WatchDog
There are 1 of WatchDog in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 3
BaseAddress: 0C00
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: IOPort
There are 3 of IOPort in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 5
BaseAddress: 1000
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: StepGen
There are 5 of StepGen in configuration
Version: 2
Registers: 10
BaseAddress: 2000
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: QCount
There are 1 of QCount in configuration
Version: 2
Registers: 5
BaseAddress: 3000
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: SSerial
There are 1 of SSerial in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 6
BaseAddress: 5B00
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 64 bytes
Module: Transformer
There are 1 of Transformer in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 2
BaseAddress: 7D00
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Module: LED
There are 1 of LED in configuration
Version: 0
Registers: 1
BaseAddress: 0200
ClockFrequency: 100.000 MHz
Register Stride: 256 bytes
Instance Stride: 4 bytes
Configuration pin-out:
IO Connections for P1
Pin# I/O Pri. func Sec. func Chan Pin func Pin Dir
1 0 IOPort None
14 1 IOPort None
2 2 IOPort None
15 3 IOPort None
3 4 IOPort None
16 5 IOPort None
4 6 IOPort None
17 7 IOPort None
5 8 IOPort None
6 9 IOPort None
7 10 IOPort None
8 11 IOPort Transformer 0 Drive (Out)
9 12 IOPort Transformer 0 Ref (Out)
10 13 IOPort Transformer 0 Null3 (Out)
11 14 IOPort Transformer 0 Null4 (Out)
12 15 IOPort Transformer 0 Null5 (Out)
13 16 IOPort Transformer 0 Null6 (Out)
IO Connections for TB1
Pin# I/O Pri. func Sec. func Chan Pin func Pin Dir
1 17 IOPort StepGen 0 Step/Table1 (Out)
14 18 IOPort StepGen 0 Dir/Table2 (Out)
2 19 IOPort StepGen 1 Step/Table1 (Out)
15 20 IOPort StepGen 1 Dir/Table2 (Out)
3 21 IOPort StepGen 2 Step/Table1 (Out)
16 22 IOPort StepGen 2 Dir/Table2 (Out)
4 23 IOPort StepGen 3 Step/Table1 (Out)
17 24 IOPort StepGen 3 Dir/Table2 (Out)
5 25 IOPort StepGen 4 Step/Table1 (Out)
6 26 IOPort StepGen 4 Dir/Table2 (Out)
7 27 IOPort QCount 0 Quad-A (In)
8 28 IOPort QCount 0 Quad-B (In)
9 29 IOPort QCount 0 Quad-IDX (In)
10 30 IOPort SSerial 0 RXData1 (In)
11 31 IOPort SSerial 0 TXData1 (Out)
12 32 IOPort SSerial 0 TXEn1 (Out)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 18530
- Thank you received: 5079
06 Sep 2020 14:48 #181013
by PCW
These are too small. I'm surprised you don't get following errors on all axis
Try .05 and .01
The Segv is because you have an old version of mesaflash
Replied by PCW on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
FERROR = 0.0051
MIN_FERROR = 0.0025
These are too small. I'm surprised you don't get following errors on all axis
Try .05 and .01
The Segv is because you have an old version of mesaflash
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mud
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mud
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 142
- Thank you received: 25
06 Sep 2020 14:57 - 06 Sep 2020 15:05 #181014
by Mud
Replied by Mud on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
Ah, stuffed by Imperial values on metric?
edit: still getting the error unfortunately.
edit: still getting the error unfortunately.
Last edit: 06 Sep 2020 15:05 by Mud.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 18530
- Thank you received: 5079
06 Sep 2020 15:06 - 06 Sep 2020 15:17 #181015
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
Possibly
The only function of the ferror limits is to stop the machine if its out of tolerance
or its trying to runaway due to misconfiguration or hardware fault.
Setting the limits too narrow is going to result in nuisance following errors
due to minor timing variations or sub optimum tuning.
If you still get the error on joint 3 it may be that joint 3 is being asked to do something it cannot.
That is, the commanded positions violate the acceleration or speed constraints of the
stepgen. This may require a halscope plot of the joint commanded and feedback positions
along with the following error to see what's going on.
Alternatively you could just set the joint 3 following error limits to large numbers (say 10 and 10) and see
what happens...
The only function of the ferror limits is to stop the machine if its out of tolerance
or its trying to runaway due to misconfiguration or hardware fault.
Setting the limits too narrow is going to result in nuisance following errors
due to minor timing variations or sub optimum tuning.
If you still get the error on joint 3 it may be that joint 3 is being asked to do something it cannot.
That is, the commanded positions violate the acceleration or speed constraints of the
stepgen. This may require a halscope plot of the joint commanded and feedback positions
along with the following error to see what's going on.
Alternatively you could just set the joint 3 following error limits to large numbers (say 10 and 10) and see
what happens...
Last edit: 06 Sep 2020 15:17 by PCW.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mud
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mud
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 142
- Thank you received: 25
06 Sep 2020 15:07 #181016
by Mud
Replied by Mud on topic Linux Mint - PlasmaC upgrade confusion
I just tried this on Joint 3:
FERROR = 0.25
MIN_FERROR = 0.05
No difference.
FERROR = 0.25
MIN_FERROR = 0.05
No difference.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.137 seconds