1. Hardware & Machines
  3. Plasma & Laser
  5. Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

More
05 Jul 2019 12:52 #138681 by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

I am with Phill. Halscope.


Halscope can save data files.

But as far as I can see it can't open them. It has a menu option, but it is disabled. I haven't tried enabling it, to see if it leads to any import code.

It's a shame, being able to exchange raw halscope data would be rather useful.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, mkardasi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jul 2019 21:40 #138708 by mkardasi
Replied by mkardasi on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

I would really like to see a comparison between your last result and the changes I suggested in this post


This a 25mm square cut in 4.82mm plate at 635mm/min. Here is a visual of the cut path.




This is cut with the original algorithm.



This is the new algorithm.
Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2019 02:02 #138716 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive
The second one looks smooth !
At the end on the second picture the z feedback goes very high, does the z axis actually move that far up?
It is puzzling as on the screenshots there is 100m/div on that z axis feedback, so moving 400m is somehow unreal.
Or am I missing something ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2019 02:30 #138718 by mkardasi
Replied by mkardasi on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

The second one looks smooth !
At the end on the second picture the z feedback goes very high, does the z axis actually move that far up?
It is puzzling as on the screenshots there is 100m/div on that z axis feedback, so moving 400m is somehow unreal.
Or am I missing something ?


My machine is in imperial units, that's the part that you are missing.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2019 02:33 #138719 by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive
Did you use the same Kerf Override values for both cuts or did you try the second one at 100%

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2019 04:47 #138721 by mkardasi
Replied by mkardasi on topic Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive

Did you use the same Kerf Override values for both cuts or did you try the second one at 100%


Same values. Kerf override 1600, height/volts 0.004.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: snowgoer540
  1. Hardware & Machines
  3. Plasma & Laser
  5. Spurious engagement of Plasmac's Anti-dive
Time to create page: 0.289 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum