LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
- PCW
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 17559
- Thank you received: 5132
09 Jan 2026 03:41 - 09 Jan 2026 14:58 #341190
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
it was true:
16 bit IN TRUE ini.traj_arc_blend_enable
I was running the torus gcode (from the torus.png --> image to gcode with whatever defaults)
EDIT: here's the gcode that triggered the bug:
16 bit IN TRUE ini.traj_arc_blend_enable
I was running the torus gcode (from the torus.png --> image to gcode with whatever defaults)
EDIT: here's the gcode that triggered the bug:
Attachments:
Last edit: 09 Jan 2026 14:58 by PCW.
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 69
09 Jan 2026 05:44 #341192
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
You are right, my apologies, I was looking at it on my phone, and it formatted it intuitively. We'll be looking into it, thank you for reporting
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- endian
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 283
- Thank you received: 91
09 Jan 2026 07:46 - 09 Jan 2026 07:55 #341197
by endian
Replied by endian on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
next testing round in 3d contouring, 25k line and later are critial and we can observing high accel-cmd peaks ... I am not expert, I need to ask you guys before create any outcomes... I can chare gcode file but here it exceeding limit
Last edit: 09 Jan 2026 07:55 by endian. Reason: editor messing - picture of scope was not present
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 69
09 Jan 2026 08:40 #341199
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
Short segments seems to have some bug, might be next week for a fix...
The following user(s) said Thank You: endian
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- endian
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 283
- Thank you received: 91
09 Jan 2026 08:49 #341200
by endian
Replied by endian on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
Do you need to share the code or any assistance please?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ruediger123
- Away
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 7
09 Jan 2026 11:55 - 09 Jan 2026 11:57 #341204
by ruediger123
Replied by ruediger123 on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
Last edit: 09 Jan 2026 11:57 by ruediger123.
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 69
10 Jan 2026 01:34 #341226
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
Share the gcode please, and we will take a look next week
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 21135
- Thank you received: 7221
10 Jan 2026 01:42 #341227
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
He did but you probably did not get a notification as he edited the existing post.
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 69
10 Jan 2026 11:44 #341231
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
@PCW
try with
setp ini.traj_max_jerk 3000
and
setp ini.traj_default_jerk 3000
I do not get acc violation with these values, can you confirm?
try with
setp ini.traj_max_jerk 3000
and
setp ini.traj_default_jerk 3000
I do not get acc violation with these values, can you confirm?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 69
10 Jan 2026 12:29 - 10 Jan 2026 12:31 #341232
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
@ruediger123
at the moment jerk-cmd are debug pins, they are not to be used for machine control, because the current calculations try and do best we can to calculate and blend quickly in realtime, there are knowm spikes in the jerk-cmd, please look at vel-cmd and acc-cmd everything looks very good to me there, there are no violations there, if we were to respect jerk cmd strictly the interpolation would not be able to run as fast as it does, but we could look at making a stricter mode viable as an alternative, or possibly the default if that's what the community needs.
at the moment jerk-cmd are debug pins, they are not to be used for machine control, because the current calculations try and do best we can to calculate and blend quickly in realtime, there are knowm spikes in the jerk-cmd, please look at vel-cmd and acc-cmd everything looks very good to me there, there are no violations there, if we were to respect jerk cmd strictly the interpolation would not be able to run as fast as it does, but we could look at making a stricter mode viable as an alternative, or possibly the default if that's what the community needs.
Last edit: 10 Jan 2026 12:31 by grandixximo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.156 seconds