1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

tommylight
Away
Moderator

30 Jun 2020 22:51 #173230 by tommylight

Replied by tommylight on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

andypugh
Away
Moderator

30 Jun 2020 23:57 #173253 by andypugh

Replied by andypugh on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

Late to the party (Working from home, bizarrely, means that for some reason I don't do the forums at lunchtime)

For motors / drives etc I have uses Zapp Automation a fair bit:
www.zappautomation.co.uk

I want to design a folding, core-XY plasma. Just for the fun of it.

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

rodw
Offline
Platinum Member

01 Jul 2020 09:40 #173301 by rodw

Replied by rodw on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

WinstonTodge wrote:
So belt position...?

I'm just playing with the CAD for giggles...

Do people think there would be a particularly large difference in performance / stiffness with either A or B belt location for the Y axis?

For simplicity, bolting the motor direct to the carriage plate and running the belt below the linear rail (image A below) would be easier, but can't help but think having the belt directly below the table tube seems a better bet (image B below). B would need an extra plate and mount though obvisously to move the motor inboard...

Thoughts? Or am I just being pedantic...?

Chris.

Chris, I think I'd go with B. I don't think it would be too hard to mount the stepper on legs like I like to use. If the mounting plate went right round the motor, you should be able to mount the legs on the motor side instead of the pulley side. How easy would that be to service?

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

andypugh
Away
Moderator

01 Jul 2020 12:02 #173311 by andypugh

Replied by andypugh on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

I would go with "C" :-)

ie, put the ball slide under the side member so muck doesn't fall in it.

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

andypugh
Away
Moderator

01 Jul 2020 12:05 #173312 by andypugh

Replied by andypugh on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

rodw wrote:
Chris, I think I'd go with B. I don't think it would be too hard to mount the stepper on legs like I like to use.

Steppers on legs is popular and effective. And I hate it :-)

If I was building a plasma it would almost certainly be a Core-XY setup.

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

WinstonTodge
Topic Author
Offline
Junior Member

02 Jul 2020 15:47 #173428 by WinstonTodge

Replied by WinstonTodge on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

I've got four 425 ozin NEMA 23 with 10mm output shaft.

How do people calculate what gearing is best suited to a small plasma table? Tommy's plasma primer suggests 16 to 20T on the drive pulley, but I can't seem to find any 10mm bore pulleys with such few teeth.

I'm thinking 10mm GT2 belt but 6mm probably would be stiff enough?

Is gear reduction sensible here?

Ta for any help,

Chris.

P.S. is there any resource around to calculate or help direct what gearing is best with the torque curve of the motor, supply voltage, maximum / minimum velocities, etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

andypugh
Away
Moderator

02 Jul 2020 16:04 #173431 by andypugh

Replied by andypugh on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

WinstonTodge wrote:
Tommy's plasma primer suggests 16 to 20T on the drive pulley, but I can't seem to find any 10mm bore pulleys with such few teeth.

Well, if you want GT2 and 16T then that's a diameter of 16 x 2 / pi = 10.18 mm, so there would be nothing left of the pulley if you bored a 10mm hole.

I'm thinking 10mm GT2 belt but 6mm probably would be stiff enough?

I have a feeling that GT2 is a US (but metric) belt standard. It doesn't seem to be stocked by the usual suspects (RS, HPC Gears, Bearing Boys) . It is 3D printer-scale belt, I would be expecting to see at least T5 x 15 used on a plasma cutter.
www.ebay.co.uk/itm/273825972643 has it at at <£4/m

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

tommylight
Away
Moderator

02 Jul 2020 16:08 #173432 by tommylight

Replied by tommylight on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

WinstonTodge wrote:
........ plasma primer suggests 16 to 20T on the drive pulley,

That is usable with microstepping drives, the ideal would be between 10 and 20mm per motor revolution on stepper systems.
There are 15 tooth pulleys with 8mm bore for HTD3 belts that would still be usable for a small plasma with microstepping drives, but they are not cheap.
That brings us to the question: where did you find Nema23 motors with 10mm shaft ? I have 6, 6.35, 8, some 5mm and even some 7mm shaft ones, but never 10 !

The following user(s) said Thank You: WinstonTodge

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

WinstonTodge
Topic Author
Offline
Junior Member

02 Jul 2020 19:52 #173447 by WinstonTodge

Replied by WinstonTodge on topic 1.2m x 0.6m plasma, <£2k questions!:

Stepper motors are from StepperOnline...

www.omc-stepperonline.com/nema-23-steppe...epper-motor-cnc.html

Didn't think enough about drive pulleys with 10mm bore and low tooth count when I bought them. They do seem nicely made though.

A 20T GT2 OD is 12mm, so one revolution would be 37.7mm per single revolution. Far from your 10 to 20mm suggestion Tommy.