Сustomization QTvcp
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
15 May 2020 06:56 #167813
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Sorry this is my problem. Thank You!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
15 May 2020 09:05 - 15 May 2020 09:10 #167824
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
I did it as in the screenshots. I can not register the line number. What's wrong?
Last edit: 15 May 2020 09:10 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7230
- Thank you received: 2106
15 May 2020 16:50 #167874
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Oh wait looks like you have readonly checked on the line edit widget.
uncheck that property
uncheck that property
The following user(s) said Thank You: hottabich
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
15 May 2020 18:39 - 16 May 2020 05:01 #167885
by hottabich
Super!!! After pressing the Push Button, the LineEdit window should be cleared and the button will become inactive, this is necessary. There was an incomprehensible problem after stop the tool continues to move with the spindle switched off. With RunFromHere it is not connected, I turned it off. Thank! Only problems in linuxcnc2.9, in 2.8 they are not here.
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Last edit: 16 May 2020 05:01 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
26 May 2020 05:01 - 26 May 2020 05:01 #168937
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Hello! Is it possible to add such a RUN FROM LINE option to QtVCP?
This will be perfect. Thank.
This will be perfect. Thank.
Last edit: 26 May 2020 05:01 by hottabich.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
27 May 2020 06:25 #169036
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Chris and Jim I congratulate you, you have created the most good and functional interface! I just rearranged the pictures in places. Thank you so much.
Wee gold specialists and people too.
Wee gold specialists and people too.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmorley
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 7230
- Thank you received: 2106
28 May 2020 02:51 #169183
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic Сustomization QTvcp
I thought you had run-from-line working already?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
29 May 2020 07:08 #169281
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
NO_FORCE_HOMING = 1. Axis Y error. How to fix?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20843
- Thank you received: 7106
29 May 2020 07:21 #169285
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Do you have 2 motors for the same axis ?
That is the error displayed when you try to move a gantry machine with two motors on the same axis, it will not move without homing the machine first.
That is the error displayed when you try to move a gantry machine with two motors on the same axis, it will not move without homing the machine first.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hottabich
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 574
- Thank you received: 96
29 May 2020 09:48 #169292
by hottabich
Replied by hottabich on topic Сustomization QTvcp
Simulator error sim.qtdragon_xyza.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: cmorley
Time to create page: 0.112 seconds